{"id":82,"date":"2006-06-18T20:26:04","date_gmt":"2006-06-18T20:26:04","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2013-04-12T14:56:48","modified_gmt":"2013-04-12T14:56:48","slug":"voting-by-phone-foundation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.evanravitz.com\/vote\/voting-by-phone-foundation\/","title":{"rendered":"Voting by Phone Foundation"},"content":{"rendered":"
formerly Government by the People<\/strong>
\noriginally the Voting by Phone Foundation<\/strong>\"\"You deserve a vote \u00e2\u20ac\u0153not just a voice- on the laws you live under!<\/strong><\/div>\n

Let’s govern ourselves! The Swiss Do<\/a>! Soon, voters in Ontario, Canada<\/a>! Perhaps soon, voters in Mexico<\/a>!<\/p>\n

In the U.S. we already have the basic tools to share the power, if we use them together:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Initiative laws<\/strong> (which allow citizens to propose and vote on legislation) now in effect in 24 U.S. states<\/a> and<\/li>\n
  2. voting by telephone<\/strong> (internet\u00c3\u00a2\u00e2\u201a\u00ac\u00e2\u201e\u00a2is great too)- successfully tested by our associate Dr. Vincent Campbell<\/a> for the National Science Foundation<\/a> in 1974. Inventor Buckminster Fuller, who first proposed “voting by telephone on all prominent questions before Congress” in his 194 0 book No More Secondhand God<\/a>, coined the term for such combining of ideas: “synergy”.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    HERE’S HOW:<\/h3>\n
      \n
    1. Legalize voting by phone (or Internet<\/a>) in regular elections, at our option. Most of us will soon prefer it because it’s:\n
        \n
      1. More Secure<\/a> than existing voting systems- which use computers poorly.<\/li>\n
      2. Cheaper<\/a> -10 or more times- than current systems.<\/li>\n
      3. Easier!<\/a> Saves you time and hassle, driving and waiting.<\/li>\n
      4. Far more environmentally sound<\/a> than existing systems.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n
      5. Encourage more citizen-initiated legislation by requiring fewer signatures to get Initiatives on the ballot and\/or by allowing petitioning by phone or internet. [The Initiative and Referendum Institute<\/a> is working to get Initiative laws passed for the other 26 states and federally.]<\/li>\n
      6. Schedule voting quarterly as the Swiss<\/a> do, to accommodate the increase in citizen Initiatives. A freer market of ideas. A more level playing field. At a cost savings.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        In states<\/a> and municipalities with existing Initiative laws, people can empower themselves by petitioning to put these three reforms onto the ballot<\/strong>. We were first in the world to put step 1 to the voters for the 1993 election<\/a> in Boulder, Colorado as the Voting by Phone ballot initiative founded by your webmaster Evan Ravitz<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        HERE’S WHY:<\/h3>\n

        Everyone agrees we must reform government: Idealistic Democrats want campaign finance reform. Idealistic Republicans want term limits. But representatives of both parties aren’t really doing these things: the foxes won’t turn over the henhouse keys. St rong campaign finance reform<\/a> ($100-limit) has been passed only by initiative: in Oregon, Montana and Missouri. Same for public campaign financing. The 20 states with term limits<\/a> for state legislators all instituted them by initiative. Columnist Molly Ivins says:<\/p>\n

        “We keep making the mistake in this country of thinking about politics as a spectrum that runs from right to left. It’s not. It’s a scale that runs from top to bottom. And the only real questions are: Who’s getting screwed and who’s doing the screw ing?”<\/cite><\/p>\n

        The Dalai Lama of Tibet is calling for a referendum<\/a> on Tibet’s future. Nelson Mandela has called for a referendum on white homelands in South Africa. And the Zapatista rebels in Chiapas, Me xico have made all their major decisions by referendum, resulting in the “women’s laws,” etc. and culminating in a “intercontinental” referendum<\/a> in September 1995 and again in March 1999. Self-government is the wave of the future! (For a great analysis of the Zapatistas’ use of the internet, see Zapatistas in Cyberspace<\/a>.)<\/p>\n

        Self-government also cuts government pork and logrolling<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        BALANCING THE PEOPLE’S POWER<\/h3>\n

        Our representatives will still be voting on legislation<\/strong>, but they’d better carry out the details of what we want, or improve on our ideas, or we’ll stop them. We say let their ideas compete with ours, and let them facilitate.<\/p>\n

        There will still be a Bill of Rights to protect the minority from the “tyranny of the majority,”<\/strong> just as it often protects us from majorities of representatives. Example: The US Supreme Court ruled 5\/20\/96 that Colorado’s 1992 citizen- initiated Amendment Two unconstitutionally<\/a> discriminates against gays; it never went into effect.<\/p>\n

        When the people make the decisions, they must live with them, so when mistakes are made there is a built-in incentive to fix them. Politicians, with careers on the line, have an incentive to cover up their mistakes.<\/p>\n